Publishing and Peer Review › Module 3: Peer review from the inside
What editors look for
Lesson 1 of 3 · 2 min
Your paper's first reader is an editor, who decides whether it goes to reviewers at all. Rejecting without review is called a desk rejection, and at selective journals it's the most common outcome.
Why papers get desk-rejected
- Out of scope: the journal doesn't publish this kind of work.
- Not enough advance for this venue: sound, but too small or too similar to existing work.
- Unclear message: the editor can't tell what's new from the title, abstract and introduction.
- Obvious flaws: no control, tiny sample, no baseline.
- Not following instructions: wrong format, over the word limit, missing statements.
- Ethics or integrity concerns: missing approvals, high text overlap.
What gets a paper sent out
- A clear, important question that fits the journal's readers.
- A clear answer, visible in the abstract and first figure.
- Sound methods, at a glance.
- A professional, complete submission.
Desk rejection isn't the end
It usually comes quickly, so you lose little time. Read the reason, fix what you can, and send to a better-fitting venue. Many excellent papers were desk-rejected first.
RememberEditors decide fast from the title, abstract, introduction and first figure. Make the fit, the message and the soundness obvious there.